Bernard Leach is, without a doubt, the best known and most prominent of British studio potters. His friendship with Shoji Hamada and his shuttling between Japan and St Ives are well documented. Born in Hong Kong; he was taken almost immediately to Japan by his grandparents. He came to England at the age of ten for schooling. After a brief spell working as a clerk for the Hong Kong and Shanghai bank he attended The London School of Art.
In 1909 he returned to Japan to teach etching which he had himself learnt from Frank Brangwyn, and while there married for the first time. After ten years of life in the East - both Japan and China - he met Hamada. The following year they both came to England and set up the Leach Pottery at St Ives. The years between the wars were hard for Leach; he spent much time re-building kilns, experimenting with materials, traveling - but not achieving much critical or financial success.
It was not until after the Second World War, and the publication of his first book, A Potters' Book, that he became widely recognized as a master in his field. He continued to pot until 1972, but did not stop his ceaseless traveling. The Victoria and Albert Museum in London held an exhibition the art of Bernard Leach in 1977, and in 1979 he died.
In 1920 Leach and Hamada made the journey half-way around the world to set up a pottery at St Ives in Cornwall. St Ives had long been an artists' colony and the pottery was built with the aid of a grant from the Handicrafts Guild. The first kiln, which was wood-fired, was made with three climbing chambers, each six feet high, six feet wide and four feet deep. This...
Critique of "essay" on Bernard Leach.
This \"essay\" on Bernard Leach is merely a biography of him. I don\'t consider it an essay because it not only describes his life in the first paragraph, but then goes on telling of what he did in what year for the rest of the text. True, this would be a good report of Bernard Leach if it were that: a report. But the author gives no imminent depth in the writing. He/She could\'ve written on subjects like \"why Bernard Leach became a potter\", \"contrasting him with another famous potter\", or \"analyzing his values and beliefs as a potter in the early 20th century\". I rate this essay with a red frowny face. I find it apparent that the author has either mixed this report of Bernard Leach with the essay of Bernard Leach or that the author has no idea how to write an essay.
2 out of 2 people found this comment useful.